What does the critique include?

An overall impression, a usability table with each finding rated critical, moderate, or minor alongside a fix, notes on what draws the eye first and how the eye moves through the layout, a consistency table, accessibility notes on contrast, touch targets, and readability, what works well, and three priority recommendations.

A screenshot works best. A detailed description also works. Add what the product is, who it is for, and whether it is an early exploration or final polish, since feedback on an early sketch differs from feedback on a finished screen.

How is this different from the AI Accessibility Checker?

This tool covers usability, hierarchy, and consistency with a short accessibility section. The accessibility checker goes deep on WCAG 2.1 AA alone, criterion by criterion, with contrast, keyboard, and screen reader tables.

Can it focus on one part?

Yes. Say "focus on mobile" or "just the navigation" and the critique goes deeper there.

It does not redesign the screen, produce a mockup, or test with real users. It is feedback from what it can see or read, so pair it with usability testing before a big launch.

AI Design Critique

Share a screenshot or a description of a screen or flow, and get a structured critique in the chat with severity-rated findings and three priority fixes.

Critique

for

stage.

Tap a field to fill it in

Nothing sends until you start, and you can change anything afterwards.

What you get

Text in the chatCopy it wherever you need it. Keep chatting to adjust the tone, length, or wording.

How it works

Share the design as a screenshot, a detailed description, or a Figma link if you have connected Figma, with what it is, who it is for, and the stage. Name a focus if you want more depth on one area.
askROI's Critique a design tool asks for the design if you have not shared one, then reviews the first impression, usability, visual hierarchy, consistency, and accessibility, each finding with a reason and a suggested fix.
Read the critique in the chat, then keep chatting to go deeper on one area or review the next version.

What people use it for

Before a design reviewfind the biggest issues in a mockup before you present it to the team.
Solo founders and developersget a designer's eye on a screen you built without one.
Flows with drop-offlook for unnecessary steps and unclear actions in signup, onboarding, or checkout.
Redesign comparisonscritique the old and the new version against the same framework.

Questions

What does the critique include?: An overall impression, a usability table with each finding rated critical, moderate, or minor alongside a fix, notes on what draws the eye first and how the eye moves through the layout, a consistency table, accessibility notes on contrast, touch targets, and readability, what works well, and three priority recommendations.
What should I share?: A screenshot works best. A detailed description also works. Add what the product is, who it is for, and whether it is an early exploration or final polish, since feedback on an early sketch differs from feedback on a finished screen.
How is this different from the AI Accessibility Checker?: This tool covers usability, hierarchy, and consistency with a short accessibility section. The accessibility checker goes deep on WCAG 2.1 AA alone, criterion by criterion, with contrast, keyboard, and screen reader tables.
Can it focus on one part?: Yes. Say "focus on mobile" or "just the navigation" and the critique goes deeper there.
What does it not do?: It does not redesign the screen, produce a mockup, or test with real users. It is feedback from what it can see or read, so pair it with usability testing before a big launch.